My first year at MIFF was in 2001, where I saw a couple of films. Since 2002, I’ve gone with a festival passport ticket. However, I’ve never been to the opening night gala event, until this year. Thanks to a very generous invitation from Screen Legend friends, I was able to see what it was all about. It was held at Hamer Hall in the Arts Centre which was nicely decked out. On the way in, VCA students were handing out leaflets trying to ‘Save the VCA’. Find out more about that at www.savevca.org if you’re interested.

Once seated there were speeches. Lots. But that’s okay. Interestingly the Vice Chancellor of Victoria University, someone who I’d have thought was used to public speaking, was the least able to ignite the crowd. Luckily Geoffrey Rush came on after her and did a great comedic intro where he compared festival director Richard Moore to Master Chef judge Matt Preston.

On to the film itself…

BALIBO
5/10
I am sure there will be much publicity about this film, which is about Roger East’s journey into East Timor in 1975 to investigate the disappearance of five Australia journalists who had been covering the invasion of the nation by Indonesia. I really like Anthony LaPaglia as an actor, and of course can see the futility in the deaths that occurred. However, a good cause ought to be separated from the quality of a film. The film wasn’t bad, but I felt a bit let down. Knowing very little (close to nothing) about the story, I found the beginning a bit confusing with its cutting back and forth between different times. Additionally, I thought that a little more regard to the 183,000 timorese who were slain might have been appropriate rather than just the few Australians. Finally, I don’t feel that the film dug deeply enough in to explaining the justifications of either side for their action, nor the political machinery in play that led to the events (or lack of regard to them afterward). Mentions of the US government’s supply of military equipment paid for in UK pounds and suggestions the Australian Gov’t was involved was about as far things went. Finally, in order to tell a story, the film came across as a bit black and white. The good guys seemed to have no flaws and the bad guys no flicker of compassion in their invasion. This story probably would have made a better documentary. One thing that seemed a little strange/morbid was that the families of the killed journalists were called to come up on stage with the respective actors who played the journalists that were killed. Anyway, you’ll doubtless find many reviews claiming this film is a must-see, etc. It’s up to you, but I think it can wait for DVD.

After the film, everyone crowded over four floors of the Hamer Hall being served drinks and snacks. I must say it was very nice food, and while there seemed to be a lot of very nicely dressed people, I’m afraid I don’t know enough about celebrities to be able to say whether I saw anyone famous amongst the party-goers.

Overall, it was a fun experience, and I’d like to do it again next year, but see it as a very different feel to the rest of the film festival.


It’s almost here! Another year of Film Festival. No more sessions at the Capitol Theatre though :(. Gossip says that RMIT couldn’t meet the OH&S needs of MIFF so it wasn’t used. A real shame.

Went to the Launch tonight. Exciting news is that Quentin Tarantino will be coming to introduce his new film, and Anthony LaPaglia will also be here. Studded with stars…

Will update the films I plan to see as soon as I’ve had time to go through the guide and figure out what’s what.

IDIOTS AND ANGELS
6/10
The last film of the festival. What a pity that I didn’t enjoy it more, but admittedly, I was very tired and have a cold, so that might have adversely affected my abilities to fully appreciate it. It’s an animation by Bill Plympton, whose film ‘Hair High’ was one of my favourites at MIFF in 2005. I really enjoyed the creativity in this film about a man who grows angel wings, but just couldn’t get into it. I may try again one day if I have the chance, but in the meantime I’ll rate it well based on the excellent animation work and poorly on the story itself.

SOMERS TOWN
8/10
One of my favourite films of the festival. Shane Meadows did last year’s Closing Night film at MIFF, This is England, and also did Dead Man’s Shoes at MIFF 3-4 years ago. I loved both of those films, and this one makes three out of three. It’s a short one, only 75 minutes, and shot in black and white. It’s the story of the friendship between a homeless boy (played by the main actor from This is England, Thomas Turgoose) and a Polish immigrant whose parents are divorced and is taken care of by his working class father. Lots of great moments and beautifully filmed with plenty to keep your eyes interested. Hopefully this will get a cinema release here.

THE WACKNESS
6.5/10
This film had all the ingredients for being fantastic, but for some reason it just didn’t equal the sum of its parts for me. It’s set in NYC in 1993(?) and is about a loner kid who’s just finished high school and is whiling away the summer dealing marijuana to the locals, including a psychiatrist played by Ben Kingsley, who offers him advice in return for some stash. I can’t help but think that it would have been better if they hadn’t tried to set it in the early 90s and just updated the story for today. Maybe I’m missing the point, but the dialogue was distracting, yo. Word.

A COMPLETE HISTORY OF MY SEXUAL FAILURES
6/10
This was a documentary, but really, like Morgan Spurlock’s Super Size Me, it’s really just made for entertainment and not for a factual unbiased representation of an event or set of facts. It’s about a guy who’s been dumped by nearly all his girlfriends over the years and sets out to try and find out why. Sorry if it’s a spoiler, but jeez, if you’re an unemployed, dirty lazy guy who plays with action figures and can’t get an erection, what do you expect? There were plenty of funny and cringeworthy moments, but I couldn’t help but think he was playing a part rather than being his true self when talking on film, and a couple of parts just seemed to much like stunts for entertainment rather than being relevant to the story (visit to the bondage mistress and the viagra episode, mainly). Not a terribly film, but I think it could have been better if he’d left the devices for entertainment out, or toned them down at least.