Before getting to today’s films, the first session today was at the lovely, lovely Capitol Theatre.

Photograph of The Capitol Theatre with a Melbourne International Film Festival slide on the screen

TWO SEASONS, TWO STRANGERS – ★★★

I sometimes go into sessions with absolutely no reference as to what they’re about, or where they’re from. Sometimes it’s due to being rushed, and sometimes it’s just to be surprised. Today was a mix of both. It’s a Japanese film that’s quite meta, in two main parts, starting with a woman writing a screenplay, then jumping into the summer story she’s writing, before being taken out of that to watch a roomful of people watching the film that we’re watching. The second part is the further story of the writer of the screenplay going on a holiday in winter. It was a slowly paced film, comfortable in taking its time to let the two stories happen. I was never bored, but at points felt like I was ready to be given the “aha” moment. If you’ve liked Hirokazu Kore-era’s films (Still Walking, Shoplifters, After the Storm), you’ll probably like this one too. I may come back to this one and give it an extra half-star depending on how I’m rating others as the festival progresses.

I SEE BUILDINGS FALL LIKE LIGHTNING – ★★★☆

This was a pretty good British film about a group of 30-something friends who’d known each other for years (some since they were at least 10 years old). Post-school, predictably, they’ve all gone in different directions in life, yet do make time to get together. I suspect a couple of things; one, that I’m slightly past the best demographic for this film, being well beyond my 30s and having had other films with a general premise of this next phase of life. The other is a suspicion that perhaps the book that it’s based on by Keiran Goddard may contain more depth than we get in a feature film. They did some things really well – the party scenes did a great job of reflecting being out with loud music. The timelapse video of the building being built was a good communicator of time passing. I did feel for a bit that it veered a little bit to the melodramatic, which I might have preferred was more underplayed. Overall though, a good watch.

ROSE OF NEVADA – ★★

A low-budget sci-fi-ish film from Cornwall (which is a beautiful place to visit). This one was ticking a few boxes for me, but unfortunately I was pretty disappointed. Perhaps it was that it was a 9 pm session at the end of a long day, on a day that was the end of a long week. I found the storytelling inconsistent, the acting inconsistent, the editing inconsistent, and the framing of shots a little bit awkward. Lots of extended close-ups of people, then the thing they were focussed on. Maybe I missed something here.

WICKER – ★★★☆

MIFF opening night film for 2026. For the third year in a row MIFF did a great job. Great cast line-up including a favourite in our household, Olivia Colman, this is a film based on short story about a woman in a small village who casts aside expectations around marriage, and is treated like an outcast by her community. After having enough, she engages the service of a wicker maker to create a husband for her. Aside from the great cast, the cinematography and special effects were all top notch as well. If I rated films out of 10 this would be a 7.5.

Melbourne International Film Festival is nearing, and as I’ve done in several previous years, I’ve scoured the guide to select which films are either ‘Can’t Miss’, ‘Want to See’, and ‘Might be worthwhile’. I will not make it to most, but hope to see as many as possible. This year, the films are:

Can’t Miss:

Want to See:

Might be worthwhile:

Must have forgotten to write some scores for film at MIFF in 2025, so posting them now, about 11 months later.

August 24, 2025

BLUE MOON – ★★★☆

August 23, 2025

TRAINS – ★★★☆

August 22, 2025

PRIME MINISTER – ★★★★

SPREADSHEET CHAMPIONS – ★★★

THE LIBRARIANS – ★★★

Documentary about librarians in the US in the more backward states who are being forced to remove books from their libraries, and are being ostracised in their communities. Somewhat predictable situation, and well enough told, but I find myself being less and less surprised about things like this in the current US environment. The two main thoughts I had was that: 1) This documentary is likely to effect little change – the left wing people will be outraged, and the right wing people will not change their minds. I’d probably prefer a harder journalistic investigation into where the money comes from to support these backward initiatives, and who is financially benefiting from them. And, 2) it’s a real pity that libraries are being told to pull books off shelves due to the fragility of the right wing religious folk, but in 2025, it’s going to be super-easy for any student to get access to the content in other ways if they want it. Aside from the copyright infringing options which are very easy to access, it’s not hard to get membership to libraries with digital collections outside the area you live in. It’d actually be cool if (say) Californian public libraries promoted themselves to students in Texas/Florida/etc and allowed them to get easy access to the material.